National Postal Mail Handlers Union - Unity · Democracy · Strength - Division of LIUNA - AFL-CIO

National Postal Mail Handlers Union A Division of LIUNA (AFL-CIO)

Media Center / Mail Handler Update

August 2026

The Postal Service Office of Inspector General’s July 2026 report, “Options for Addressing the U.S. Postal Service’s Financial Gap,” lays out 15 possible strategies to close USPS’s massive financial shortfall. While framed as a neutral menu of options rather than recommendations, several of these proposals would directly affect Mail Handlers’ jobs, pay, benefits, and union rights.

Maintaining Service Standards But Increasing Revenue

One set of options outlined in the OIG’s report is that the Postal Service continues to provide the current array of services and address the financial issues through more flexibility in the ability to increase prices and through government funding.

Layoffs and Headcount Reduction

One of the report’s “Restructure the Workforce” options directly targets headcount. The OIG estimates that a 10% workforce reduction—through hiring freezes, voluntary early retirement (VERA), reduction-in-force (RIF), or layoffs where contractually permitted—could save $5.6 billion annually.

Pre-Career Employee Conversions

A related proposal would end the automatic conversion of MHAs and other pre-career employees (who receive lower pay and fewer benefits) to career status.

Outsourcing Operations

Outsourcing mail processing and transportation could save $1.3 billion, according to OIG, by shifting work to private-sector companies by paying lower OIG believes that this would eliminate the need for “a large complement of mail handlers, processing clerks, and Postal Vehicle Service personnel.”

The Bigger Picture

Critically, most of these changes require either congressional legislation or union negotiation—they cannot happening unilaterally. But the report signals that labor costs, which make up 76% of USPS’s total expenses, are a central target in any plan to close the Postal Service’s financial gap, making continued union engagement in these debates essential.

Full Article Text (PDF)

PDF Version

Directory

Local 297 Local 298 Local 299 Local 300 Local 301 Local 302 Local 303 Local 304 Local 305 Local 306 Local 307 Local 308 Local 309 Local 310 Local 311 Local 312 Local 313 Local 314 Local 315 Local 316 Local 316 Local 317 Local 318 Local 320 Local 321 Local 322 Local 323 Local 324 Local 325 Local 327 Local 328 Local 329 Local 330 Local 331 Local 332 Local 333 Local 334 Local Unions
Enlarge Map